Legal Opinion

Robert and Carole Zackim v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 13, 1989No. 89-1211PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Chief Judge:

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue appeals from a decision of the Tax Court determining that there was no deficiency in taxes of taxpayers Robert and Carole Zack-im for the tax year 1979. The Commissioner’s notice of deficiency for that year asserted that they owed deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax for that year due to fraud. A majority of the Tax Court held that the Commissioner was precluded from asserting a deficiency for 1979 based on fraud by the doctrine of res judicata, because an earlier decision in the Tax Court had been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION, (U.S.) AND SUBSIDIARIES, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT—APPELLANTCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Burke v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  3. Ron Lykins, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  4. ToweUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  5. Bohner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API