Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1957PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomliusoN

Plaintiffs-in-error, Franklin and Malone, appeal from a conviction “of receiving and concealing stolen property”, that being the second count of a two-count indictment wherein the first count charges larceny of the goods in question, to-wit, two calves. Jessie Miser, who was jointly indicted and convicted with them, did not appeal.

At the outset, the Court should thank Mr. Easterly of the Greeneville Bar for his unselfish services in representing these defendants — plaintiffs-in-error — by appointment of Court.

Malone, Franklin and Miser came to the home of Harrison Britt fairly late in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parham v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Asbury v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. TharpeTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Conner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  3. Peek v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Deerfield v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API