Alexander v. Strathairn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*931We agree with the Family Court that the October 18, 2004, order entered on consent setting the father’s child support obligation adequately complied with Family Court Act § 413 (1) (h) (see Ricca v Ricca, 57 AD3d 868, 869 [2008]; Blaikie v Mortner, 274 AD2d 95, 100, 101 [2000]). Moreover, since the mother failed to show either an unanticipated, substantial change in circumstances since the entry of the consent order, or that the child’s reasonable needs were not being met with the current level of support, an upward modification was properly denied (see Friedman v Friedman, 65 AD3d 1081…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Morrissey v. MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Blaikie v. MortnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Love v. LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Friedman v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nelson v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kandus v. ForlenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Reese v. ReeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Reese v. ReeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Talty v. TaltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.