Legal Opinion
Onett v. Ahola
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 9, 2001No. 5D99-3639PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
780 So.2d 979 (2001)
George L. ONETT, Appellant,
v.
Robert AHOLA and Geneva Maria Ahola, et al., Appellees.
No. 5D99-3639.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 9, 2001.
George L. Onett, Ocala, pro se.
Randy Fischer of Boehm, Brown, Seacrest, Fischer & LeFever, P.A., Ocala, for Appellees Aholas.
Gregory D. Jones and Collins M. Guyton of Rywant, Alvarez, Jones, Russo & Guyton, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Stump.
2Per curiam
In this pro se appeal, George Onett argues that the trial court abused its discretion in reserving ruling on his motion for a continuance of trial and his motion for a sixty…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Fleming v. FlemingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- US Borax, Inc. v. ForsterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
4Cited by5 opinions
- Department of Children and Families v. LDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Myers v. SiegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Cole v. HERITAGE COMMUNITIES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Coleus v. Florida Commission on Human RelationsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Micic v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008