Legal Opinion

Baum v. Link

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1920Published

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, second district, entered upon a dismissal of a complaint in favor of the defendant A. Langstadter, Inc.

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff herein sustained injuries through the collision of a wagon in which the plaintiff was driving with an automobile which he claims was under the control of the defendant A. Langstadter, Inc. The action was originally brought not only against the defendant A. Langstadter, Inc., but also against Arthur Link and William Link. Before the trial the action against them was discontinued. At the trial the plaintiff produced testimony sufficient to make out a prima facie case that he sustained injuries by a collision with an automobile which was negligently driven by its chauffeur. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNamara v. . LeipzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Hartell v. T. H. Simonson & Son Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. McNamara v. LeipzigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API