Legal Opinion
Kates v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided November 20, 1968No. Docket Nos. 1208-66 - 1210-66, 1212-66 - 1215-66UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Morris Kates and Betty Kates, et al. 1 v. Commissioner.
Kates v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 1208-66 - 1210-66, 1212-66 - 1215-66.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1968-264; 1968 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 35; 27 T.C.M. (CCH) 1423; T.C.M. (RIA) 68264;
November 20, 1968. Filed
Dean S. Butler and Dudley M. Lang, Suite 1100 Wilflower Bldg., 615 S. Flower St., Los Angeles, Calif., for the petitioners. Myron A. Weiss, for the respondent.
FORRESTER
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
FORRESTER, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined the following deficiencies in petitioners' income taxes:
Dkt.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rupe Investment Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Rupe Inv. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Damner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
- Matern v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Matern v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kling v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981