Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bloomingdale

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 23, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The motion of Mrs. Geanne H. B. Butler to dismiss the proceeding brought by Richmond J. Reese for the settlement of his third intermediate account and his supplemental account is denied. There is not the slightest foundation in the Surrogate’s Court Act or in the practice of this court or in the decisions for the granting of such a motion.

The executor was appointed by a decree of this court made many years ago by Mr. Surrogate O’Brien. He has acted ás co-executor with the executrix, the moving party here, for a period of over nine *844years. It appears to be contended in the papers that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Will of BloomingdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re ErenstoftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of ReeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of ReeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API