Legal Opinion

Fordice v. Bryan

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1995No. 94-CA-00031Published

1Opinion of the Court

651 So.2d 998 (1995)

Kirk FORDICE, Governor of the State of Mississippi, Appellant,

v.

Hob BRYAN, Glenn E. Endris, John Horhn and Mike Moore, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, as Intervenor on Behalf of the People of Mississippi, Appellees.

No. 94-CA-00031.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

January 12, 1995.

John G. Corlew, Steven D. Orlansky, Leah D. McDowell, Watkins & Eager, Jackson, for appellant.

Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Jackson, Otis R. Tims, Mitchell McNutt Threadgill Smith & Sams, Tupelo, Tacey Clark Humphrey, Mitchell McNutt Firm, Corinth, for appellees.

En Banc.

JAMES L. ROBERTS,…

Also in this document: Dissent · Smith; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hawkins; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lee; Concurrence; Dissent · Smith.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Moore v. MolpusMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Alexander v. State by and Through AllainMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dye v. State Ex Rel. HaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API