Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Chadd Ex Rel. Estate of Boardman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 2015No. 12-36023Published

1ConcurrenceBerzon, Circuit Judge

I concur in Judge O’Scannlain’s opinion, which I believe correctly applies our precedents regarding the discretionary function exception to the troubling facts of this ease. I agree with Judge Kleinfeld, however, that our jurisprudence in this area has gone off the rails. In particular, in my view, Miller v. United States was wrong when it concluded that the decision at issue “need not be actually grounded in policy considerations” but need only be, “by its nature, susceptible to a policy analysis.” 163 F.3d 591, 593 (9th Cir.1998); see also GATX/Airlog Co. v. United States, 286 F.3d 1168,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Gatx/airlog Company Gatx Capital Corporation Airlog Management Corporation Frederick L. Hatton and Sanford P. Burnstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API