Legal Opinion

State v. Havas

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1975No. 8309PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

Victor Rowland Havas, the respondent, was charged with rape. After a preliminary hearing, he was held to answer the charge in the district court. Thereafter, he petitioned that court for a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted. The State has appealed from the order granting the writ. The sole issue presented for our consideration is whether the record taken before the magistrate establishes “probable cause to believe that an offense [rape] has been committed and that the defendant has committed it.” NRS 171.206. State v. Fuchs, 78 Nev. 63, 368 P.2d 869…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FuchsNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. In re Kelly ex rel. OsunaNevada Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ex parte LiotardNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  5. In THE MATTER OF ERVIN v. LeypoldtNevada Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. HavasNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Culpepper v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Flowers v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Jones v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API