Legal Opinion
Damariscotta-Newcastle Water Co. v. Itself, Re: Increase in Rates
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided September 1, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThaxtee, J.
This case is before ns on exceptions to certain rulings of the Public Utilities Commission. The Damariscotta-New-castle Water Company, which furnishes water to the towns of Damariscotta and Newcastle, filed a complaint with the commission against itself seeking an increase in its rates. As a basis for such relief it asked the commission to determine the rate base and .the investment on which it should be entitled to a fair and reasonable return. The Inhabitants of Damariscotta appeared in the hearings and claim to be aggrieved by the rulings of the commission.
There are three exceptions before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Department of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Alfred J. Sweet, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
- Hamilton v. Caribou Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- In re Samoset Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Madow v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- Gore v. JohnWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Public Utilities Commission v. GallopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.