Legal Opinion

Clayton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1990No. A90A1098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of possession of cocaine. Appellant’s sole enumeration of error is that the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury on the defense of entrapment.

In his testimony at trial, appellant denied that he committed the crime claiming that he did not know he was carrying a package containing cocaine. “ ‘[I]f a reasonable inference of entrapment may be drawn by a rational jury from the State’s evidence, the defendant is entitled to a jury charge on entrapment unless he has presented evidence of entrapment inconsistent with his denial of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Gregoroff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Harold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Busener v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hinton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Byrd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Edmondson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API