Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zarranz v. Coral Gables Hospital, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 1991No. Nos. 91-1270, 91-1954Published

1DissentLevy, Judge

I respectfully dissent based upon my conclusion that the trial court correctly determined that the term “net revenue from professional services” in the contract is unambiguous, and thus summary judgment was correctly entered in favor of Coral Gables Hospital. While the pertinent facts are stated in the majority opinion, they bear repeating in greater detail to more clearly focus on the point at issue.

Dr. Zarranz and Coral Gables Hospital entered into a written contract which basically provided that Dr. Zarranz would relocate his practice from Tampa, Florida, to the Coral Gables Hospital in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurt v. Leatherby Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Boat Town USA v. MERCURY MARINE DIVDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Ethel v. First Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Memorial Sales, Inc. v. PikeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. CAREFREE VILLAGES v. Keating Properties, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API