Legal Opinion

Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Co. v. Portalis & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTierney, J.

The amended complaint sets forth separately two distinct causes of action. The defendant has answered each with denials and pleaded several counterclaims thereto, to which a reply has been served. More than twenty days have elapsed since the service of the complaint. The defendant makes this motion for a judgment upon the pleadings of dismissal of the first cause of action upon the ground that the facts alleged do not constitute a cause of action. The plaintiff raises the objection that this motion is not authorized by the Rules of Practice. Such a motion cannot be made under the Code of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Co. v. Portalis & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API