Neppach v. Norval
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
Rehearing denied January 5, 1926.
On Petition for Rehearing.
(242 Pac. 605.)
McBRIDE, C. J.
In a petition for rehearing, which is apparently studiously designed to be offensive rather than to discuss calmly the matter in hand, counsel begins by charging the court with making a misstatement as to the character and quality of this suit, in that the court used this language:
“This is a suit to declare a resulting trust in certain lots situated in the City of Portland.”
It does not require any lengthened argument to show that the complaint either was directed to a resulting or constructive trust, or…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Howe v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Dorman v. DormanIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Harbour v. HarbourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.