Legal Opinion

Neppach v. Norval

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1925Published

1Opinion

Rehearing denied January 5, 1926.

On Petition for Rehearing.

(242 Pac. 605.)

McBRIDE, C. J.

In a petition for rehearing, which is apparently studiously designed to be offensive rather than to discuss calmly the matter in hand, counsel begins by charging the court with making a misstatement as to the character and quality of this suit, in that the court used this language:

“This is a suit to declare a resulting trust in certain lots situated in the City of Portland.”

It does not require any lengthened argument to show that the complaint either was directed to a resulting or constructive trust, or…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Smithsonian Institution v. MeechSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Howe v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  4. Dorman v. DormanIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Harbour v. HarbourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API