Legal Opinion

Mertz v. Mertz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1973No. 72-794PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

287 So.2d 691 (1973)

Robert B. MERTZ, Appellant,

v.

Annette H. MERTZ, Appellee.

No. 72-794.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 28, 1973.

Joseph J. Davies, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Hugh E. Reams, Kiernan & Reams, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

McNULTY, Judge.

Appellant-husband in this dissolution of marriage proceeding presents four points on appeal, only two of which are meritorious and require reversal. Appellee's cross-appeal is without merit.

First, we think the trial court erred in awarding appellee-wife rehabilitative alimony in the absence of a showing of facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stamm v. StammDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Hernandez v. HernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Rosen v. RosenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. Price v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Patterson v. PattersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Deatherage v. DeatherageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API