Michael M. v. Judith M.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Elrich A. Eastman, J.

The petitioner has filed objections to the Hearing Examin*713er’s decision of June 26, 1990, dismissing the instant petition for downward modification.

Petitioner asserts that the dismissal, for failure to establish a prima facie case, was an abuse of discretion. The Hearing Examiner indicates that the facts asserted by petitioner do not constitute a change of circumstances. Moreover, the Hearing Examiner was not inclined to disturb a "recently set and fair order of support of the Supreme Court.”

It is well established that a downward modification of a…