Legal Opinion

Hobart v. Hobart

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1881Published

Appeal from so much of an order made at Special Term, confirming the report of sale of a referee, as fixes and determines his fees and compensation.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

From the papers presented in this case it appears that Delos A. Beilis, as referee appointed by the court, made a sale of divers pieces of real estate for the gross sum of $2,827.42. His report shows that of this amount he applied sixty-two dollars and thirty-nine cents for taxes, etc., as directed by the court, retained the sum of $196.69 for his disbursements, fees and charges, and paid the balance to the county treasurer of Yates county as directed by the court. When the report came to the Special Term it was confirmed except as to the referee’s fees and disbursements, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lynch v. MeyersNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1870
  2. Richards v. . RichardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API