Legal Opinion

John A. Roebling's Corp. v. Bodrog

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 24, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jacobs, J.

The Appellate Division reversed decisions of the Board of Review which found that the claimant Andrew Bodrog, Jr., was “eligible” and that the claimant Ruth E. Kerecman was “not ineligible” for unemployment benefits during a vacation shutdown of the John A. Roebling’s Corp. plants. We granted certification under R. R. 1:10-2.

The John A. Roebling’s Oorp. had collective bargaining agreements which provided for paid vacations for employees with sufficient seniority and permitted the company to stagger vacations or concentrate them during…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teichler v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Watson v. United States Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Glover v. Simmons Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Employment Commission v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. O'Rourke v. Board of Review, Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API