Legal Opinion

State v. Newton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1974No. 7427SC95PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant argues that she was entitled to a nonsuit because there was a fatal variance between the charge and the proof. The bill of indictment charged defendant with possession of “Desoxyn.” The evidence tended to establish that she possessed methamphetamine. Because there was no evidence offered at trial to establish that “Desoxyn” contained methamphetamine, defendant argues that the State failed to prove the charge contained in the bill of indictment.

The trial judge instructed the jury that Desoxyn and methamphetamine were the same thing. Defendant assigns this…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Masters v. Rodgers Development Group, S. C., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. In the Matter of HarrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. StithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API