Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1922No. 2586PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). It affirmatively appears from the recital in the judgment set out in the statement above that the rescission awarded was based on the findings alone of the jury that the tractor was not made of good material and would not do good and serviceable work if properly adjusted and operated by a competent person. That being true, if those findings did not warrant the judgment, this court cannot assume, as, otherwise, it might, if the testimony warranted them (article 1985, Vernon’s Statutes) that the trial court made other findings which, considered with those the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. DavenportTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Potter v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. W. D. Sessums Motor Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Liquid Carbonic Co. of Texas v. MigurskiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dillard v. ClutterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. C. A. Bryant Co. v. Hamlin Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Benton Roberts Dry Goods Co. v. Cyrus W. Scott Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Beck v. Dallas Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API