Legal Opinion
United States v. Faust
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 4, 2015No. 14-8011PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant David Michael Faust was convicted of attempted online enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Mr. Faust challenges his conviction on two grounds. First, he argues that there was insufficient evidence of intent to engage in illegal sexual activity with a minor to support his conviction. Second, he contends that the district court abused its' discretion by refusing to provide his proposed specific-intent jury instruction. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I
On August 6, 2013, a Federal Bureau of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. RodebaughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. IsabellaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. RodellaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.