Legal Opinion

Fickling v. City Council of Augusta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1964No. 40885PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The law imposes on owners and occupiers of land the duty not to expose persons to unreasonable risks of harm created' by conditions on the land. Prosser on Torts, 2d Ed., 119, § 30; 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts 1453, § 27.5; Restatement, Torts 925, § 339, Comment on Clause (d). Many decisions upon facts similar to those stated in this petition have held that owners and occupiers of land have no duty to take affirmative action to protect persons whom they do not invite on the land from the hazards of a pond. The reasoning of these decisions, some of which are cited infra, is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. McCall v. McCallieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Crawford v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. St. Clair v. City of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Montega Corp. v. GroomsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Spooner v. City of CamillaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Sheley v. Board of Public EducationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Venable v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API