Legal Opinion

Clayton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 2010No. 3D10-641PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a). We affirm because the motion is successive.

Clayton was convicted and sentenced after a jury trial on July 7, 2006, which was affirmed on February 20, 2008. See Clayton v. State, 974 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Clayton then filed a post-conviction relief motion, which was considered on May 20, 2008, and denied without an evidentiary hearing. Clayton appealed and on November 5, 2008, we issued our opinion, affirming. See Clayton v. State, 994 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). Clayton then…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. Scrambling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Clayton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Clayton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clayton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API