Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Zimmerman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This is a proceeding instituted by Mr. W. R. Osborne, plaintiff, for the purpose of contesting the nomination, at the primary election held on May 17, 1940, of Mr. Peter Zimmerman, defendant, as a republican candidate for representative from Yamhill county, in the House of Representatives in the state of Oregon. Both Mr. Osborne and Mr. Zimmerman were candidates for that nomination at snch primary election.

The proceeding was dismissed by the trial court upon motion of defendant for the reason notice of such contest was not served upon defendant within the time required by section 36-802,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Whitney v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Pringle Falls Power Co. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Whallon v. BancroftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  4. United States Nat. Bank v. SheflerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. De Golia v. AndersenOregon Supreme Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beardsley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Meyer v. MeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mahan v. SparksDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API