Legal Opinion

Provident Savings Life Assur. Soc. v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 22, 1906No. 51PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

On December 28, 1900, the Provident Savings Fife Assurance Society of New York (the defendant below and plaintiff in error) issued its policy for $25,000 to Selwyn M. Taylor upon his life. The policy provided:

“The amount assured hereby will not become binding upon the society ■unless this policy is in force at the time of the death of the assured nor •unless such death shall occur within five years from the date hereof, except as this assurance may be renewed and continued thereafter as provided upon the third page of this policy.”

It also provided:

“This assurance is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Kentucky Life & Accident Insurance v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southland Life Ins. Co. v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Yvonne Nicolson v. Life Insurance Company of the SouthwestCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Mitchell v. Southern Union Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Goldberg v. The Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Satery v. Great American Reserve Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API