Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Advertising Co. v. County of Monterey

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1970No. S. F. 22659Published

1DissentSullivan, J.

I dissent.

In my judgment the majority opinion, although avowedly relying upon decisional precedents, actually represents a radical alteration of existing California law. The resulting change would not in itself cause me concern, if I were satisfied that it was responsive to a growth of principle or that it would in all probability improve the applicable rule of law. Nevertheless, I feel that however pragmatically desirable the majority may view the result in this case, the rule which they have created in achieving it may only confuse the trial courts of this state and in the long run may…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API