Legal Opinion

Cushman & Denison Mfg. Co. v. Grammes

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1916No. 1081PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the Cushman & Denison Manufacturing Company against Harry A. Grammes and others, doing business as E. E. Grammes & -Sons. On exceptions to interlocutory report of master.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The parties to this controversy seem to be in accord only in the thought that this litigation should be brought to an end. A perusal of the record impresses one with the same thought. The opinion of Judge McPherson, accompanying the order of J uly 3, 1914, gives the then state of the record. By that order the status of the case, presenting a decree against the defendants as prayed for and a reference to a master to state an account, was left undisturbed, except in the respect that the master was directed to take and report any evidence and testimony submitted in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cushman & Denison Mfg. Co. v. GrammesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Universal Builders Supply, Inc. v. Shaler Highlands Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API