Legal Opinion

Garvin v. Hickam

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1937No. 1493PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge. .

Knox L. Garvin is aggrieved at the dis-allowance of his amended claim against York Petroleum Company, á bankrupt, hereinafter called York, in the sum of $103,424.-50. The claim is founded upon a contract for the sale of corporate stock in Wirt Franklin 'Petroleum Corporation.

J. I. Cromwell and his wife and their son owned in survivorship all of the stock in York. Cromwell was president, director, and general manager. His wife and son sometimes participated in conferences and signed minutes, but he exercised complete domination and control of it. It did not operate oil…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. First Nat. Bank v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  3. Scottsville Nat. Bank v. GilmerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  4. In re KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  5. In re RoeberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Szatkowski v. Meade Tool & Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. In Re DietzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  3. In Re Imperial Sheet Metal, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1973
  4. In Re Dialysis Service Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  5. In re KellerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API