Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 6, 1972PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEARN, Judge.

The question is whether or not the Trial Court was correct in granting the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s proof, the defendants having elected not to adduce proof.

It is the duty of this Court in reviewing the Trial Court’s action on a motion for a directed verdict to look to all of the evidence, take the strongest legitimate view of it in favor of the opponent of the motion, and to allow all reasonable inferences from it in his favor, and to discard all countervailing evidence. If then there is any dispute as to any material…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  2. Gargaro v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Shell Oil Company v. BlanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  5. Allison v. Blount National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McCormick v. WatersTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Benson v. H.G. Hill Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  3. Jackson v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1976
  4. Pridemark Custom Plating, Inc. v. Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Wilson v. Thompson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API