Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between State Mutual Automobile Insurance & Mercado

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs, by providing that the arbitration proceed under the terms of the arbitration clause in the insurance policy, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Generally, arbitration is to proceed according to the provisions in the contract (see Matter of Siegel [Lewis], 40 NY2d 687; Matter of Astoria Med. Group [Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y.], 11 NY2d 128; Matter of Lipschutz [Gutwirth], 304 NY 58). Under the contract here, one arbitrator is chosen by each party and these two then choose a third. The contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Arbitration Between Astoria Medical Group & Health Insurance PlanNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Siegel & LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between Lipschutz & GutwirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of State Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API