Legal Opinion

Donofro v. Dick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 4, 1996No. Nos. 95-3616, 95-4282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAN NORTWICK, Judge.

Paul Donofro, Jr., as personal representative of the Estate of Joan Donofro, deceased, appeals both a final declaratory judgment ruling that usury does not constitute a defense to or basis for avoidance of a promissory note and mortgage made by Joan Donofro and held by appellee, Robert K. Dick, and an order granting attorney’s fees to Dick. Do-nofro argues that the trial court erred (i) in finding that Dick did not possess the requisite “corrupt intent” to receive more than the lawful rate of interest under the Donofro note and (ii) in granting “reasonable” attorney’s fees…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jersey Palm-Gross, Inc. v. PaperSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Sumner v. Inv. Mortgage Co. of Fla.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Dean v. CoyneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Sepler v. EmanuelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. A & E International Enterprises, Inc. v. Gold Credit Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Valliappan v. CruzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API