Legal Opinion

Knight v. . Thomas

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It was argued at the bar, and admitted by the Court, that the judges heretofore have decided that under the acts of 1784, ch. 10, sec. 7, a parol conveyance of negroes is good as between the parties themselves, as before the making of this act; but was void as to creditors, as well creditors who became such after the conveyance as those who were creditors at the time; for the mischief intended to be remedied by the act was that subsequent creditors had been defeated of their debts contracted upon the credit of a man's visible property, by means of secret gifts to children and others, made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Ingram v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1836
  2. M'cree v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
  3. Palmer v. . FaucettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1829
  4. State Ex Rel. Woods v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1822
  2. Rhodes v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1822

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API