Legal Opinion

Macfarlane v. Damon

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Question Reserved by Judd, C.J.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

McCully, J.: Dole, J., Dissenting.

The petitioner for the writ of mandamus alleges that the respondent, Samuel M. Damon, is the Minister of Finance, and as‘such has charge of the disbursements of the Public Treasury; that in the appropriation bill for the current biennial period there was appropriated for the payment of His Majesty’s Chamberlain the sum of six thousand dollars. That during said period, to wit, on October 1st, 1888, His Majesty appointed under the great seal of the Kingdom and commissioned the' *20petitioner his Chamberlain, and that the petitioner has since…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Dorsey v. SmythCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Mayfield v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. O'Leary v. . Board of Education of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re PringleHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In re AustinHawaii Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API