Legal Opinion

Arcaro v. Arcaro

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.

This is a motion by defendant George 0. Arcaro and by other corporate defendants to vacate and cancel notices of pendency of actions instituted by his wife.

The allegations of the amended and supplemental complaint which plaintiff relies upon to authorize the filing of the lis pendens pursuant to section 120 of the Civil Practice Act are found in the first and last causes of action. Plaintiff Ann G. Arcaro, wife of defendant, claims in her first cause of action that she and her husband formed a partnership for the purpose of engaging in the real estate business. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roedel v. RoedelNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API