Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cler v. Providence Health System-Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2010No. CC 0401-00189; CA A130443; SC S056715Published

1DissentLinder, J.

A common situation in jury trials, both civil and criminal, is the problem of the so-called “invited response” or “invited reply.” It occurs when one party, in closing argument, resorts to an improper argument that, if left unaddressed, could mislead the jury or otherwise encourage the jury to base its verdict on an impermissible consideration. The other party fails to object and, to counter the provoking argument, resorts to improper argument in response. If the party who provoked the exchanges loses and appeals, it often falls to the appellate court to determine in such a circumstance…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. Bender v. AdelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API