Legal Opinion

Dix v. Spampinato

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 1976No. [No. 104, September Term, 1975.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

278 Md. 34 (1976)

358 A.2d 237

DIX, ETC. ET AL.

v.

SPAMPINATO ET AL.

[No. 104, September Term, 1975.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 2, 1976.

Motion for reconsideration filed June 23, 1976.

denied July 12, 1976.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and[*]O'DONNELL, JJ.

Francis N. Iglehart, with whom was Michael J. Lambros on the brief, for appellants.

James E. Gray for Patricia Mae Spampinato, one of appellees. William A. Hegarty for Jeanette Horak, other appellee.

2Opinion of the Court · SingleySingley, J.

LEVINE and ELDRIDGE, JJ., dissent and ELDRIDGE, J., filed a dissenting opinion…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  3. Nizer v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Yommer v. McKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Gamet v. JenksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API