Burris v. McConnell
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
The original bill herein was filed by the appellees, mother and son, against the appellants, daughter and sister, for partition of a farm left the parties by the father and husband Alfred McConnell, when he died intestate in 1932.
As to whether or not the farm was divisible in kind was a controverted matter. The Chancellor determined the farm not divisible in kind and ordered a sale of the farm in two tracts. The appellant and her husband eventually became the purchasers of both tracts for $10,-000. Before the order confirming the sale was entered, an order of reference was entered ordering…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grier v. CanadaTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Carey v. CareyTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Hutcheson v. HutchesonTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by4 opinions
- Edingbourgh v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Burris v. McConnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- State of Tennessee v. Shanessa L. SokoloskyTennessee Supreme Court · 2025
- Yarbro v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974