Legal Opinion

Burris v. McConnell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The original bill herein was filed by the appellees, mother and son, against the appellants, daughter and sister, for partition of a farm left the parties by the father and husband Alfred McConnell, when he died intestate in 1932.

As to whether or not the farm was divisible in kind was a controverted matter. The Chancellor determined the farm not divisible in kind and ordered a sale of the farm in two tracts. The appellant and her husband eventually became the purchasers of both tracts for $10,-000. Before the order confirming the sale was entered, an order of reference was entered ordering…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grier v. CanadaTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Carey v. CareyTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hutcheson v. HutchesonTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edingbourgh v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Burris v. McConnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State of Tennessee v. Shanessa L. SokoloskyTennessee Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Yarbro v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API