Legal Opinion
Schloss v. Koslow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Prudenti, P.J.
The essential question presented on this appeal is whether the mutual wills of Sophie F. Koslow, now deceased, and of her husband, the defendant, Albert B. Koslow, contained provisions that would now entitle the plaintiff, Rhonda Schloss, to a constructive trust and judgment directing the defendant to transfer approximately 50% of his assets to her. We hold that the plaintiff is not entitled to this relief, or to any other form of relief requested in the complaint.
The plaintiff alleges that the defendant, her uncle by marriage, violated a covenant that he had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rastetter v. . HoenningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Tutunjian v. VetzigianNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Oursler v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Rubenstein v. MuellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Blackmon v. Estate of BattcockNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aaron v. AaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Matter of the Estate of Betty Kay KalistyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025