Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Ernst & Young & Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 28, 2000No. 05-97-00810-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By Justice WHITTINGTON.

In this common-law fraud case, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Pacific”) appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of Ernst & Young, L.L.P. (“Ernst & Young”). 2 In two points of error, Pacific contends the trial judge erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Ernst & Young and denying Pacific’s motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this cause for further proceedings.

Background

In late 1986 and early 1987, Ernst & Young’s predecessor, Arthur Young & Company,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, DerivativeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  4. Krohn v. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  5. National Western Life Insurance v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API