Legal Opinion

Green v. Richards

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Argued on final hearing upon pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

This suit is to compel the defendant to convey to the complainants, or one of them, a house and lot in the city of Newark, as specific performance of agreements entered into by him with each of them. The bill sets forth a parol agreement made by the defendant with Mr. Green, also certain acts in part performance; and also an agreement in writing afterwards entered into by him with Mrs. Green for a conveyance of the same premises on the same terms. It *33prays performance of one or the other. The bill is not multifarious. The uniting these two contracts in one bill may be a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heim & Hillbrook Acres, Inc. v. ShoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. City of Camden v. South Jersey Port Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Denville Amusement Co., Inc. v. FogelsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Zippler v. WestneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API