Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Middendorf

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 15, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-2352-TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*54OPINION

TAURO, District Judge.

This action involves a petition for Habeas Corpus by a reserve officer seeking release from the United States Navy as a Conscientious Objector. 50 U.S.C. App. § 456(j).

On March 4, 1971, Michael L. Gold-stein accepted a Commission as a Lieutenant in the United States Naval Reserve, thereby incurring a six year reserve and a two year active duty obligation. The program in which he enrolled, popularly known as the “Berry Plan,” allows a physician to defer compulsory military service in order to obtain specialized residency training while on inactive duty. Lobis v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael L. Goldstein v. J. William MiddendorfCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API