Courchane v. Kuntz
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy
Greg and Nancy Courchane appeal from the judgment of the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, Hill County, dismissing their claims against Flynn Realty, Inc. pursuant to Rule 41(e), M.R.Civ.R We affirm the District Court.
The sole issue raised by appellants is whether the District Court properly interpreted Rule 41(e) to prohibit the addition of a new defendant to an action more than three years after its commencement.
On February 1, 1985, Ronald and Susan Kuntz conveyed their Havre home to Greg and Nancy Courchane by warranty deed. Sometime after the sale, Courchanes discovered the sewer…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Livingston v. Treasure CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sinclair v. Big Bud Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1993