Chadwick v. Gold Kist, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THIGPEN, Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation case.
Roy Chadwick filed a complaint against Gold Kist, Inc. (Gold Kist), alleging that he suffered a compensable back injury while working for Gold Kist. After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court entered a detailed order finding that Chadwick was permanently, partially disabled and suffered a 75% disability of his ability to earn. The trial court ordered compensation accordingly. Chadwick appeals.
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the evidence supports the trial court’s determination regarding the extent of Chadwick’s disability.
At…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Genpak Corp. v. GibsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Allen v. Diversified ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Suit v. Hudson Metals, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- SOUTHERN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE v. ThomasCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gore v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- Trotman Elec. Co., Inc. v. O'BrienCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Sheffield v. Brown & Root Construction, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993