Legal Opinion
ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 15, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01305Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 21cv1305-BAS(BLM) 11 ImprimisRx, LLC, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DE-DESIGNATE AS 13 v. CONFIDENTIAL; GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER 14 OSRX, Inc.; and OCULAR SCIENCE, Inc., SEAL; GRANTING’S PLAINTIFF’S 15 Defendants. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST 16 FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 17 [ECF NOS. 41, 43, 44, 47, 48] 18 19 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to File Under Seal [ECF No. 41], Motion to De- 20 Designate as Confidential [ECF No. 43],…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Burrell v. Hampshire CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.