United States v. Footracer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WIGGINS; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Johnny Roy Footracer, a Native American, claims that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a jury venire reflecting a fair cross-section of the community because his criminal trial was transferred from the District of Arizona’s Prescott Division, the division in which the alleged crimes were committed, to the Phoenix *1060Division, which contains a much smaller percentage of Native Americans. We affirm Footracer’s conviction.
I
In September 1996, a federal grand jury indicted Johnny Roy Footracer on seven counts of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Jones v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. ButeraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rhyne v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. ConantDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Ben-Sholom v. AyersDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Rhyne v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.