Legal Opinion

United States v. Footracer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1999No. 97-10528PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge WIGGINS; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

Johnny Roy Footracer, a Native American, claims that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to a jury venire reflecting a fair cross-section of the community because his criminal trial was transferred from the District of Arizona’s Prescott Division, the division in which the alleged crimes were committed, to the Phoenix *1060Division, which contains a much smaller percentage of Native Americans. We affirm Footracer’s conviction.

I

In September 1996, a federal grand jury indicted Johnny Roy Footracer on seven counts of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Jones v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. ButeraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. United States v. ConantDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  3. Ben-Sholom v. AyersDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  4. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  5. Rhyne v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API