United States v. Israel Nava-Arellano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Israel Nava-Arellano appeals his conviction and sentence imposed for felony illegal entry following a prior illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. He appeals his conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the facts of this case, we need not recount them here.
I
The district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding Nava-Arellano’s proffered documents under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. First, the district court did not legally err by failing to expressly acknowledge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. James Scott DalyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jorge Valdavinos-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Rigoberto Castellanos-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Espinoza-BazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nava-Arellano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013