Legal Opinion

United States v. Israel Nava-Arellano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2013No. 12-50195UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Israel Nava-Arellano appeals his conviction and sentence imposed for felony illegal entry following a prior illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. He appeals his conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the facts of this case, we need not recount them here.

I

The district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding Nava-Arellano’s proffered documents under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. First, the district court did not legally err by failing to expressly acknowledge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. James Scott DalyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Jorge Valdavinos-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Rigoberto Castellanos-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Espinoza-BazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nava-Arellano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API