Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Graber v. Matley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus. Application to intervene and cancel writ.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In the month of January, 1885, an election was held in Garfield county to determine the permanent location of the *565county seat of that county. At that time the county was divided into six precincts, named as follows: “ Rockford, Willow Springs, Calamus, Dry- Cedar, Midvale, and Urina.” The towns of Burwell and Willow Springs Were the contestants for the county seat. On the 5th ■day of last February, the defendant Matley called to his assistance the defendants Davis and Brownell as a board of canyassers to canvass the returns of said election. They found that Willow Springs had a majority of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. People ex rel. Case v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Dobson v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. State ex rel. Rice v. County JudgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  5. Hamilton v. State ex rel. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wahl v. SpeerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. State ex rel. C., B. & Q. R. v. North Lincoln Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Leidigh v. HolcombNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Welty v. McFaddenNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Olson v. ClaneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API