Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 6, 1999No. A99A2296PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Michael Bernard Scott appeals from his Gwinnett County conviction of forgery, contending that the trial court erred in limiting his cross-examination of co-defendant Angela Agnew.

Viewed in favor of the jury’s verdict, the evidence was that, on July 18, 1998, Agnew was driven by Scott to Galleria Mall. Also in the car was Webster, Scott’s girlfriend. All three lived in the same apartment complex, and Scott had asked Webster to go to eat and to a movie that afternoon. After arriving at the mall, Agnew alone went into Parisian where she attempted to purchase a dress with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hines v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Nealy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Turtle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Lemons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Melson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. The State v. EnichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API