Legal Opinion

Walter W. Oeflein, Inc. v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

In view of the decision in Biersach & Neidermeyer Co. v. State, ante, p. 388, 188 N. W. 650, it will be unnecessary in this opinion to consider the constitutional questions raised in this case.

Sec. 1729/> — 1 of the 1919 Statutes provides, among other things, as follows:

“1. It shall be tmlawful to influence, induce, persuade or attempt to influence, induce, persuade or engage workmen to change from one place of employment to another in this state or to accept employment in this state or to bring workmen of any class or calling into this state to work in any department of labor in this state,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Biersach v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Capt. Soma Boat Line, Inc. v. City of Wisconsin DellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. International Union, Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Fuller v. SpiekerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State ex rel. Dinneen v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. SchmitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API